Myths of Homelessness Part 6: “It’s Too Expensive To Fix”

Lived Experience Perspective

This series is written from lived experience. Posts are authored by Red Conrad, a Co-Founder and the Strategic Alliance Lead of the Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition, and other coalition members who have experienced homelessness firsthand. We’re giving you an inside look at the reality behind the myths.

Myths of Homelessness Table of Contents 

If you think solving homelessness is expensive, you haven’t seen the invoice for ignoring it.

In our recent post on The Hidden Price Tag: Why Solving Homelessness Is A Fiscal Win, we showed that Housing First models save 30-68% compared to the status quo. But let me show you what that looks like right here in Putnam County.

The Waste I Witnessed

I’ve watched it happen multiple times—police officers pulling into the Walmart parking lot to ask people sleeping in vehicles to leave. Not because they were causing problems. Not because they were breaking laws. Because they were homeless.

Each interaction takes 20-30 minutes. That’s officer time, patrol vehicle costs, radio dispatch, and paperwork. Multiply that by every parking lot, every night, across Putnam County. That’s not public safety—that’s expensive crisis management disguised as enforcement.

And here’s what makes it worse: those people just drive to another parking lot. Nothing is solved. The officer’s time is wasted. The person is still homeless. The taxpayer foots the bill for both.

This is the “status quo” we’re paying for.

The Myth of “Free Inaction”

The biggest lie is that doing nothing costs nothing. It doesn’t. When Putnam County lacks stable housing infrastructure like the proposed R.I.S.E. facility (Residential Initiative for Stability and Employment), the costs don’t disappear—they just shift to the most expensive parts of our budget.

As we established in Myth #3, keeping someone homeless in Putnam County costs taxpayers approximately$85 per day—$31,025 annually—through:

  • Police responses (approximately $31,000 per year per person)
  • Emergency medical services and hospital visits (approximately $31,000 per year per person)
  • Court processing (up to $415 per offense)

Providing permanent supportive housing costs approximately $28 per day, or $10,220 annually. That’s a $20,805 per person per year savings.

The Status Quo is a Luxury Tax

Right now, Putnam County is choosing to pay premium prices for the worst possible outcomes. Here’s where that $85 per day goes:

  • Emergency Rooms: A single ER visit for a condition that worsened because someone had nowhere to rest, store medication, or maintain basic hygiene can cost thousands. Taxpayers cover uncompensated care through higher insurance premiums and county budgets. As we showed in Myth #5, withholding basic services doesn’t motivate people—it just creates more expensive emergencies.
  • Law Enforcement Bottlenecks: When officers spend their shifts managing parking lot displacement instead of preventing actual crime, we’re paying high-level salaries for low-yield results. Every hour spent on homeless camp relocations is an hour not spent on burglaries, domestic violence, or traffic safety. That’s a misallocation of resources, not a solution.
  • The Jail-as-Shelter Trap: Housing someone in a county jail cell costs $50-100+ per day in Florida. That’s more than double the cost of permanent supportive housing, with none of the stabilization benefits. It’s the least efficient model imaginable.
  • The Cleanup Cycle: Regular sweeps of homeless encampments cost money in staff time, equipment, and disposal—only to have camps reappear weeks later because we haven’t addressed the underlying problem. We’re paying to move the crisis around, not solve it.

The Return on Investment

National data from the National Alliance to End Homelessness shows Housing First models—providing stable housing so people can address root causes (as we discussed in Myth #4)—consistently save taxpayers money.

Stabilization cuts emergency service use by 50-80% on average. The cost of permanent housing plus case management is typically $15,000-$30,000 cheaper per person per year than the jail-hospital-street cycle, with median public savings around $18,000+ annually.

In Putnam County’s case, our own data shows even starker savings: $20,805 per person per year by shifting from crisis management to housing stability.

In any other industry, we call this a bottleneck. In homelessness policy, people call it “fiscal conservatism.” It’s time we call it what it really is: waste.

The R.I.S.E. Solution

The coalition isn’t asking Putnam County to spend more money. We’re asking to redirect the money we’re already wasting into a solution that actually works.

The R.I.S.E. facility (Residential Initiative for Stability and Employment) is designed to be the “front door” for stability in Putnam County—a centralized facility that provides:

  • Immediate shelter (ending the Walmart parking lot displacement cycle)
  • Case management (addressing root causes, not just symptoms)
  • Employment support (as we showed in Myth #1, 40% of unhoused individuals are already working)
  • Medical coordination (preventing expensive ER visits)
  • A pathway to permanent housing (not a permanent shelter, but a transition point)

R.I.S.E. is currently awaiting city and county approval. It’s backed by data from our local Point-in-Time count, aligned with the Gloria Johnson Act standards, and coordinated through our Partner Portal to ensure agencies and churches work together efficiently.

This isn’t a handout. It’s infrastructure investment that will slash long-term operating costs while actually solving the problem.

The Bottom Line

Don’t tell me we can’t afford to fix homelessness. Tell me why we’re comfortable wasting millions on a status quo that fails everyone.

I watched officers spend their shifts managing parking lots because we refuse to provide actual shelter. I’ve seen the coalition track emergency costs that could have paid for permanent housing ten times over. The money is already being spent—we’re just spending it in the least effective way possible.

Solving homelessness isn’t just moral. It’s the only fiscally smart move for Putnam County’s bottom line. The current approach isn’t “fiscal conservatism”—it’s operational inefficiency with dollars we’re already spending.

Get Involved:

The Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition is advocating for R.I.S.E. and the infrastructure that will save taxpayer money while ending the cycle of crisis.

Share Your Story

Have lived experience, frontline insight, or a Putnam-specific myth to debunk?
Coalition partners, advocates, and neighbors are invited to contribute a guest post or share your story.

Your insights help us drive the reality of homelessness in our community.
Email PutnamHomelessSolutions@gmail.com to contribute.
Together, we build a fuller picture.


Discover more from Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Comments

4 responses to “Myths of Homelessness Part 6: “It’s Too Expensive To Fix””

  1. Myths of Homelessness Part 7: “If I Don’t See It, It’s Not Happening” – Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition Avatar

    […] as we established in Part 6, displacement doesn’t erase cost. It simply pushes the leak deeper into the system, where it […]

    Like

  2. Myths of Homelessness Part 8: “Most Are Dangerous or Criminals” – Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition Avatar

    […] minor, survival-related (e.g., public intoxication, loitering), not violent threats. This echoes Part 6 on how criminalization worsens cycles rather than solving […]

    Like

  3. Myths of Homelessness Part 9: “The Demographic Myth” – Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition Avatar

    […] groups requiring tailored support. This builds on Part 1‘s challenge to stereotypes and Part 6‘s look at how systemic gaps perpetuate […]

    Like

  4. Myths of Homelessness Part 13: “Homelessness is Unsolvable” – Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition Avatar

    […] Hidden Cost of Inaction: In Part 6 (The Cost Myth), we broke down how leaving one person on the street costs taxpayers roughly $35,000 […]

    Like

Leave a comment